Implementation and Analysis of Real-Time Streaming Protocols

Description

A study analyzing the most used video streaming protocols, focusing on RTSP and WebRTC, with developed platforms to compare their performance in Android and web real-time video streaming applications.

URL

• Visit resource

Related resources

• FOSDEM 2020: Which Video Network Streaming Protocol Should I Use?FOSDEM Open Media devroom talk comparing SRT, RTSP, RIST, WebRTC, HLS and DASH for live video network streaming use cases.
• Harnessing WebRTC for Large-Scale Live StreamingACM SIGCOMM 2025 paper on scaling WebRTC for large-audience low-latency live streaming.
• Performance of Low-Latency HTTP-based Streaming PlayersMMSys'21 paper comparing AVPlayer, Shaka, HLS.js, and Dash.js performance under LL-HLS and LL-DASH.
• Low Latency Live Streaming Implementation in DASH and HLSACM MM'22 paper (Bentaleb et al.) on low-latency live streaming implementation, code contributions merged into hls.js.
• Latency Target based Analysis of the DASH.js PlayerTrace-driven testbed evaluation of ABR-vs-latency-target tradeoffs in dash.js low-latency streaming.
• The Analysis of DASH Manifest OptimizationsAmazon-authored ACM Green Multimedia Systems workshop paper analyzing MPD manifest size optimization techniques.
• FOSDEM 2024: Streaming Live Using RIST On Demand to ThousandsFOSDEM Open Media devroom talk on a real-world RIST architecture achieving 500ms glass-to-glass latency at scale, comparing RIST vs QUIC.
• KTH Thesis: Interoperable Retransmission Protocols for Low-Latency Video (RIST/SRT)Master's thesis academic evaluation comparing RIST and SRT retransmission protocols for low-latency video contribution.
• low-latency-dash-ffmpegDockerized ffmpeg reference configuration for LL-DASH per-frame moof chunk streaming.
• RIST vs SRT: Technical ComparisonElecard's technical deep-dive comparing RIST and SRT low-latency transport protocols.