100ms: RTMP vs WebRTC vs HLS - Live Video Streaming Protocols Compared

Description

A detailed comparison of RTMP, WebRTC, and HLS protocols, highlighting their differences in latency, scalability, quality, and reach. This resource assists developers in choosing the appropriate protocol based on their specific live video streaming requirements.

URL

• Visit resource

Related resources

• Harnessing WebRTC for Large-Scale Live StreamingACM SIGCOMM 2025 paper on scaling WebRTC for large-audience low-latency live streaming.
• FOSDEM 2020: Which Video Network Streaming Protocol Should I Use?FOSDEM Open Media devroom talk comparing SRT, RTSP, RIST, WebRTC, HLS and DASH for live video network streaming use cases.
• Low Latency Live Streaming Implementation in DASH and HLSACM MM'22 paper (Bentaleb et al.) on low-latency live streaming implementation, code contributions merged into hls.js.
• FOSDEM 2024: Streaming Live Using RIST On Demand to ThousandsFOSDEM Open Media devroom talk on a real-world RIST architecture achieving 500ms glass-to-glass latency at scale, comparing RIST vs QUIC.
• RIST vs SRT: Technical ComparisonElecard's technical deep-dive comparing RIST and SRT low-latency transport protocols.
• Performance of Low-Latency HTTP-based Streaming PlayersMMSys'21 paper comparing AVPlayer, Shaka, HLS.js, and Dash.js performance under LL-HLS and LL-DASH.
• KTH Thesis: Interoperable Retransmission Protocols for Low-Latency Video (RIST/SRT)Master's thesis academic evaluation comparing RIST and SRT retransmission protocols for low-latency video contribution.
• low-latency-dash-ffmpegDockerized ffmpeg reference configuration for LL-DASH per-frame moof chunk streaming.
• RTMP: A Quick Deep-DiveBroadcast Knowledge conference talk video deep-diving RTMP protocol internals and its displacement by SRT/RIST/Zixi in modern contribution…
• The Analysis of DASH Manifest OptimizationsAmazon-authored ACM Green Multimedia Systems workshop paper analyzing MPD manifest size optimization techniques.